Well, well, well, I see our wonderfully bigoted and highly religious hypocrites over at the ACLU are at it again, this time persuading an equally bigoted and highly religious hypocrite of an activist judge to order the State of Texas to stop displaying God’s Constitution, aka the Ten Commandments, on school walls.
And why is that?
Because a group of religious parents, some of whom claim to be Jewish or Christian, “do not wish their children to be pressured to observe, venerate, or adopt the religious doctrine contained in the Ten Commandments.”
Say what?
That’s right.
Religious parents, some of whom claim to be Jewish or Christian, do not want their children seeing the Ten Commandments on the walls at their public schools.
Apparently, neither the Jewish, nor the Christian, parents are aware that the Ten Commandments are of Jewish derivation.
Oh well, it is just a minor detail and who notices such things?
Anyway, that is according to what District Judge Orlando J. Garcia wrote in his ruling, today, who slapped a temporary injunction upon public schools in Texas, thereby preventing them from posting the Ten Commandments.
Of course, on the face of it, all these parents have asked an activist judge to do is go along with their ridiculous contradiction.
Not only are they doing the very thing they falsely assume the public schools, and the State of Texas, are doing by forcing their religious views on the majority of Texans, they are admitting to a bald-face lie; that some of them are Jews and Christians.
Because real Jews and real Christians love God’s Constitution; they will not petition an ungodly, secular, activist judge, who really has no authority in such matters, to quash it.
They know it provides life and liberty to them AND their children; it does not thwart them by leaving everyone to do as he or she pleases, and that without objective moral guidance and constraints.
Moreover, real Jews and Christians will not use their children as pawns to further an otherwise demonic plan to silence God when it comes to education, especially when God has made it plain that “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction” (Prov. 1:7).
In other words, no God amounts to no real instruction or knowledge.
Knowing God is to know real instruction and knowledge.
But, as has been the case before, the parents and Judge Garcia also misrepresented the Establishment Cause in their special pleading to further bolster their claim that the Ten Commandments are unconstitutional.
First of all, the U.S. Constitution says nothing about the Ten Commandments, even though U.S. Law is based, in part, upon the Ten Commandments.
It is an interesting irony they conveniently overlooked.
Second, the Establishment Clause that has been extracted from the First Amendment and then distorted or perverted by the ungodly to push their anti-Christian agendas says nothing about preventing the posting of religious comments or “prohibiting the free exercise” of religion in government run entities, such as public schools.
Yet, it has everything to do with preventing government from interfering in the establishment and practice of religious activities.
In fact, it was Thomas Jefferson, and his letter to the Danbury Baptist Association back on January 1, 1802, that the ACLU-types have also perverted, who made it clear that the “wall of separation” was to keep government out of the church’s business, not that churches were to keep their noses out of government’s business.
He wrote,
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
What is curious to me is why, since we have these statements readily available to us, the perverts, morons, and deviants in society are allowed to tie up our courts, our schools, our government, or simply society, in general, with their idiocies.
Why not simply tell these hypocritical parents, “If you don’t want your children to see the Ten Commandments at school, and you want them to grow up to be the same kind of hypocrites that you are, then have them look the other way and they will be. Otherwise, just what exactly are you afraid of?”
Until such time, though, here we go again.
The ACLU has struck back, at least until it is struck down—again.
May God’s force be with the State of Texas.

Be the first to comment on "The Unconstitutionality of God’s Constitution?"