How NOT to Argue Against the Trinity Mormon Style: Part 3

In the previous two videos dealing with Dr. Daniel McClellan’s attack upon the Trinity, I showed where not only his original thesis statement, that the Trinity is found nowhere in the New Testament, to be false, and also that the Trinitarian doctrine took place prior to (not after) the New Testament being finally canonized and closed.

In Part 3, Dr. McClellan now wants to change subjects and attack the New Testament, which I argue, briefly, has nothing to do with his opening salvo upon the Trinity.

This is the first of several short videos that will eventually conclude why is was not wise for Dr. McClellan to argue against the Trinity in the way that he did.

In fact, for anyone, Mormon or otherwise, to argue against the Trinity is simply not wise at all.

About the Author

Paul Derengowski, Ph.D.
Founder of the Christian Apologetics Project PhD, Theology with Dogmatics, North-West University (2018); MA Apologetics with Honors, BIOLA University (2007); ThM, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (2003); MDiv, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary (2000); BA Pastoral Ministry & Bible, Baptist Bible College (1992)